AHPA submits comments to DEA on potential impacts of scheduling herbal constituents

Market Alerts

July 2022

June 2022

May 2022

April 2022

February 2022

November 2021

  • SCNM Dedicates Ric Scalzo Institute of Botanical Research
  • August 2021

    July 2021

    March 2021

    February 2021

    November 2020

    October 2020

    September 2020

    August 2020

    July 2020

    June 2020

    April 2020

    February 2020

    January 2020

  • Sabinsa's parent company Sami Labs breaks ground on $30 million state of the art production facility
  • Unstoppable Moms Across America launches new Gold Standard to shift the marketplace for a healthier planet
  • Draco Achieves Safe Quality Food (SQF) certification of its manufacturing facilities
  • August 2019

    June 2019

    May 2019

    March 2019

    February 2019

    January 2019

    December 2018

    November 2018

    October 2018

    September 2018

    August 2018

    July 2018

    May 2018

    April 2018

    March 2018

    February 2018

    January 2018

    December 2017

    November 2017

    October 2017

    September 2017

    August 2017

    July 2017

    June 2017

    AHPA submits comments to DEA on potential impacts of scheduling herbal constituents

    December 2016: DEA should avoid restricting research on new medical uses, health benefits, or other uses for botanicals

    Published: Monday, December 5, 2016

    In comments submitted last week to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA) urged the agency to refrain from using its authority to effectively remove a plant from the existing marketplace because naturally occurring constituents become scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

    AHPA's comments were submitted in response to DEA's request for input on consideration for scheduling two naturally occurring constituents (mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine) of the kratom plant under the CSA.

    "AHPA is opposed to DEA using its scheduling authority in a manner that would have the effect of removing from the existing marketplace an herbal article simply because of the naturally occurring presence of one or more constituents that have become subject to scheduling under the broad standards established in the CSA," said AHPA President Michael McGuffin. "In AHPA's view, such scheduling would be an abuse of discretion."

    When considering if a constituent of a botanical that is currently and traditionally used for recognized health benefits should be scheduled under the CSA, AHPA recommends that DEA abstain from any decision that would restrict future research on new medical uses, health benefits, or other uses of the constituent or the herb in which the constituent is naturally occuring.

    "AHPA believes restrictions on research are contrary to the interests of science and ultimately detrimental to the public interest," McGuffin said. "AHPA members want to ensure that any process that proposes to classify a naturally occurring constituent of a plant as an illicit substance, includes a thorough evaluation of available scientific data and full consideration of potential risks and benefits of consuming the substance."

    View and download AHPA's comments >>

    Print

    2022 Annual Fund Sponsors

    AHPA appreciates the support of its sponsors, but does not endorse, recommend, or provide a warranty for any sponsor company, its products or services. AHPA has no responsibility for any transaction entered into with any of these companies.